We start
things off this week where we left off last week--TheRed Penny Papers. Today, however, we're treated to a guest
post from one of the lead editors at the online periodical, KV
Taylor. I reviewed the spring edition of Red
Penny Papers last Friday, so after you read this, you can
click here to read that. Enjoy.
The
Joys of Short, Dark Fiction
by
KV Taylor
At The
Red Penny Papers, my co-collector John and I make no bones about
our preference for the dark. Pulp of all kinds, from the somber to
the hilarious, is welcome, but we do ask that it has that edge to it,
that sharp little stab -- or that giant axe-wound. It doesn't have to
be horror; dark fantasy, dark sci-fi, even dark historicals can all
work to that end, and can even be funny at the same time. All that's
needed is that push that forces us, the readers, to face some fear or
doubt we have to shove aside to get on with our everyday business.
Good dark fiction is a discovery not just for the author, but for the
reader, and the best dark fiction is a conversation between them.
The problem
is that this can be hard to sustain over a long period of time. I
love horror movies, but with most of them, by the time I get to the
end, I'm like, "Yeah, okay, you're trapped with some zombies and
there are brains everywhere; I'm kind of over the part where I was
afraid of you, by now." Part of that is the tendency of dark
fiction, especially pulp, to abide by certain tropes that when
overplayed make us all roll our eyes--many of which are
well-documented on the
famous Strange
Horizons
site. One of the best ways to sustain that tension is to subvert
the tropes, turn them inside out, or show them to us through
different eyes, which is what we like best at The
Red Penny Papers.
But even
that can be a stretch. Darkness seems to have the best sucker-punch
effect in small, potent doses, where the author doesn't have to
sustain, but to build and then release with perfect timing. It's
harder to do effectively, but so brilliant when it works. It takes a
clarity of purpose that often eludes a writer (or, at least, this
writer) on the first draft or planning stages, but it's well worth
while.
For
example, compare an overwrought horror film with one of the
terrifying early episodes of Supernatural or scarier X-Files
episodes. Almost all of the disappointing horror in the world
could've been improved if crammed into a forty-five minute episode
instead of being unnaturally spread out over the course of a
meandering two-hour film. Quick, sharp, painful, leaves you spinning
and hurting but eager for more. That's how you know you've read a
good story, that feeling in the guts.
It's part
of why short fiction will never die, and why we like to celebrate it
so much. But it's also a difficult format, perhaps more so than the
novel, depending on who you ask and what they're more used to
writing. It's true what they say: it's not the story, it's how you
tell it. And authors of short fiction know this better than most, I
reckon.
That's why
I, at least, love them so much.
KV
Taylor is an avid reader and writer of dark speculative fiction
and super-powered love. Originally from the Appalachian foothills of
West Virginia, she currently lives in the D.C. Metro Area with her
husband and mutant cat. In her spare time she enjoys comic books,
Himalayan Buddhist art, loud music, her Epiphone, and Black Bush. She
edits for Morrigan Books and collects The Red Penny Papers in her
dining room.
1 comment:
I completely agree. I love horror movies and books, but the endings are always so disappointing.
Its no wonder that most of the good horror exists in anthologies.
Post a Comment